Workflow execution record

Extension audit workflow: tool call, prompts, and data flow

An end-to-end reconstruction from the saved pi session and workflow artifacts, including the exact workflow tool input and every fully expanded child-agent prompt.

1. Original request

have a workflow analyize all of the extensions in here, and then plan out a set of suggested simplificiations/bug fixes then send me the plan

2. Discovery before orchestration

The assistant first inspected the working directory. This file listing informed how the four audit scopes were partitioned.

bash({
  "command": "pwd && find . -maxdepth 3 -type f | sort | head -300"
})

3. Execution flow

  1. The workflow tool received one argument: the complete JavaScript in arguments.script. No args or background value was supplied.
  2. The script launched four audit agents concurrently with concurrency: 4. Each received the shared audit instructions plus a scope-specific suffix, the AUDIT JSON schema, and effort: 'high'.
  3. Successful structured audit results were collected into usable; failures were reduced to their error strings.
  4. The integration prompt interpolated JSON.stringify(usable), so it received the complete outputs of the three successful partition audits.
  5. The planning prompt interpolated the same partition outputs, the complete structured integration review, and the audit failure list.
  6. The script returned audit counts, failure details, integration status, and the planning agent's Markdown output.

4. Exact workflow tool call payload

This is the literal tool-call envelope preserved in the session. JSON escaping such as \n is part of the serialized envelope; the readable JavaScript follows in the next section.

Show complete tool call JSON (5,710 characters) 
{
  "name": "workflow",
  "arguments": {
    "script": "export const meta = {\n  name: 'extension-audit',\n  description: 'Audit every local pi extension for bugs and simplification opportunities, then synthesize a prioritized implementation plan.',\n  phases: [\n    { title: 'Audit', detail: 'Review extension groups in parallel against pi extension APIs and project conventions.' },\n    { title: 'Cross-check', detail: 'Look for integration risks, duplicated abstractions, and missing tests across groups.' },\n    { title: 'Plan', detail: 'Produce a concrete prioritized simplification and bug-fix plan.' }\n  ]\n}\n\nconst AUDIT = {\n  type: 'object',\n  properties: {\n    scope: { type: 'string' },\n    filesReviewed: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },\n    findings: {\n      type: 'array',\n      items: {\n        type: 'object',\n        properties: {\n          severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low'] },\n          category: { type: 'string', enum: ['bug', 'simplification', 'testing', 'maintainability', 'performance', 'security'] },\n          title: { type: 'string' },\n          evidence: { type: 'string' },\n          recommendation: { type: 'string' },\n          files: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }\n        },\n        required: ['severity', 'category', 'title', 'evidence', 'recommendation', 'files']\n      }\n    },\n    strengths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }\n  },\n  required: ['scope', 'filesReviewed', 'findings', 'strengths']\n}\n\nconst root = '/Users/davis/.pi/agent'\nconst docs = '/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent'\nconst common = `You are auditing TypeScript extensions in ${root}. Read ${root}/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read ${docs}/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into ${docs}/docs and examples under ${docs}/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.`\n\nphase('Audit')\nconst audits = await parallel([\n  () => agent(`${common}\\nAudit all smaller extension groups and their related prompt/support files: ${root}/extensions/ask-user, ${root}/extensions/firecrawl-search, ${root}/extensions/git-info, ${root}/extensions/model-info, ${root}/extensions/ui-customization, and ${root}/extensions/copy-all.ts. Ensure every file in those scopes is reviewed.`, { label: 'audit:surface-extensions', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),\n  () => agent(`${common}\\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/shared, including all tests. Focus especially on lifecycle, cancellation, timeout, state ownership, and duplicated abstractions.`, { label: 'audit:shared', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),\n  () => agent(`${common}\\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/subagents, including all tests and its use of shared modules. Focus on concurrency, cancellation, session cleanup, delivery correctness, takeover behavior, and UI state.`, { label: 'audit:subagents', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),\n  () => agent(`${common}\\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/workflows, including sandbox-child.cjs and all tests. Focus on sandbox security/correctness, orchestration concurrency, cancellation, serialization, artifacts, lifecycle cleanup, and over-complexity.`, { label: 'audit:workflows', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' })\n], { concurrency: 4 })\n\nconst usable = audits.filter((r) => r.ok).map((r) => r.structured)\nconst failures = audits.filter((r) => !r.ok).map((r) => r.error)\n\nphase('Cross-check')\nconst cross = await agent(`${common}\\nYou are the integration reviewer. Here are independent audit results:\\n${JSON.stringify(usable)}\\nAudit cross-extension interactions in ${root}/extensions, verify the most consequential claims directly in source, discover duplicated infrastructure or inconsistent lifecycle semantics spanning groups, and note findings the partitioned reviews missed. Do not edit. Return evidence-backed findings only.`, { label: 'cross-check:integration', phase: 'Cross-check', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' })\n\nphase('Plan')\nconst plan = await agent(`Act as a senior maintainer. Build a concise, actionable implementation plan from the extension audit below. The codebase is ${root}. Do not invent issues and do not edit files. Deduplicate overlapping findings, discard claims not supported by concrete evidence, and prioritize correctness/security before simplification. Group work into 3-6 ordered phases. For each item include: priority (P0-P3), exact files, the change, rationale/observed failure mode, tests to add/update, dependencies, and rough effort (S/M/L). Explicitly list low-value suggestions to defer and explain why. Also include an audit coverage summary and any audit failures. Output polished Markdown ready to send directly to the user.\\n\\nPartition audits:\\n${JSON.stringify(usable)}\\n\\nIntegration review:\\n${cross.ok ? JSON.stringify(cross.structured) : `FAILED: ${cross.error}`}\\n\\nAudit failures:\\n${JSON.stringify(failures)}`, { label: 'plan:maintainer', phase: 'Plan', effort: 'high' })\n\nreturn {\n  auditCount: usable.length,\n  auditFailures: failures,\n  integrationReviewOk: cross.ok,\n  plan: plan.ok ? plan.output : `Plan synthesis failed: ${plan.error}`\n}"
  }
}

5. Complete workflow JavaScript

export const meta = {
  name: 'extension-audit',
  description: 'Audit every local pi extension for bugs and simplification opportunities, then synthesize a prioritized implementation plan.',
  phases: [
    { title: 'Audit', detail: 'Review extension groups in parallel against pi extension APIs and project conventions.' },
    { title: 'Cross-check', detail: 'Look for integration risks, duplicated abstractions, and missing tests across groups.' },
    { title: 'Plan', detail: 'Produce a concrete prioritized simplification and bug-fix plan.' }
  ]
}

const AUDIT = {
  type: 'object',
  properties: {
    scope: { type: 'string' },
    filesReviewed: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
    findings: {
      type: 'array',
      items: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low'] },
          category: { type: 'string', enum: ['bug', 'simplification', 'testing', 'maintainability', 'performance', 'security'] },
          title: { type: 'string' },
          evidence: { type: 'string' },
          recommendation: { type: 'string' },
          files: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }
        },
        required: ['severity', 'category', 'title', 'evidence', 'recommendation', 'files']
      }
    },
    strengths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }
  },
  required: ['scope', 'filesReviewed', 'findings', 'strengths']
}

const root = '/Users/davis/.pi/agent'
const docs = '/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent'
const common = `You are auditing TypeScript extensions in ${root}. Read ${root}/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read ${docs}/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into ${docs}/docs and examples under ${docs}/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.`

phase('Audit')
const audits = await parallel([
  () => agent(`${common}\nAudit all smaller extension groups and their related prompt/support files: ${root}/extensions/ask-user, ${root}/extensions/firecrawl-search, ${root}/extensions/git-info, ${root}/extensions/model-info, ${root}/extensions/ui-customization, and ${root}/extensions/copy-all.ts. Ensure every file in those scopes is reviewed.`, { label: 'audit:surface-extensions', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),
  () => agent(`${common}\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/shared, including all tests. Focus especially on lifecycle, cancellation, timeout, state ownership, and duplicated abstractions.`, { label: 'audit:shared', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),
  () => agent(`${common}\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/subagents, including all tests and its use of shared modules. Focus on concurrency, cancellation, session cleanup, delivery correctness, takeover behavior, and UI state.`, { label: 'audit:subagents', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' }),
  () => agent(`${common}\nAudit every file under ${root}/extensions/workflows, including sandbox-child.cjs and all tests. Focus on sandbox security/correctness, orchestration concurrency, cancellation, serialization, artifacts, lifecycle cleanup, and over-complexity.`, { label: 'audit:workflows', phase: 'Audit', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' })
], { concurrency: 4 })

const usable = audits.filter((r) => r.ok).map((r) => r.structured)
const failures = audits.filter((r) => !r.ok).map((r) => r.error)

phase('Cross-check')
const cross = await agent(`${common}\nYou are the integration reviewer. Here are independent audit results:\n${JSON.stringify(usable)}\nAudit cross-extension interactions in ${root}/extensions, verify the most consequential claims directly in source, discover duplicated infrastructure or inconsistent lifecycle semantics spanning groups, and note findings the partitioned reviews missed. Do not edit. Return evidence-backed findings only.`, { label: 'cross-check:integration', phase: 'Cross-check', schema: AUDIT, effort: 'high' })

phase('Plan')
const plan = await agent(`Act as a senior maintainer. Build a concise, actionable implementation plan from the extension audit below. The codebase is ${root}. Do not invent issues and do not edit files. Deduplicate overlapping findings, discard claims not supported by concrete evidence, and prioritize correctness/security before simplification. Group work into 3-6 ordered phases. For each item include: priority (P0-P3), exact files, the change, rationale/observed failure mode, tests to add/update, dependencies, and rough effort (S/M/L). Explicitly list low-value suggestions to defer and explain why. Also include an audit coverage summary and any audit failures. Output polished Markdown ready to send directly to the user.\n\nPartition audits:\n${JSON.stringify(usable)}\n\nIntegration review:\n${cross.ok ? JSON.stringify(cross.structured) : `FAILED: ${cross.error}`}\n\nAudit failures:\n${JSON.stringify(failures)}`, { label: 'plan:maintainer', phase: 'Plan', effort: 'high' })

return {
  auditCount: usable.length,
  auditFailures: failures,
  integrationReviewOk: cross.ok,
  plan: plan.ok ? plan.output : `Plan synthesis failed: ${plan.error}`
}

6. Exact prompts received by each child agent

These are not templates. Paths and runtime JSON substitutions are fully expanded exactly as recorded in transcripts.json. The cross-check and planning prompts are therefore much longer than their source templates.

audit:surface-extensions — Audit — exact expanded prompt (1,352 characters)

Recorded state: done

You are auditing TypeScript extensions in /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Read /Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs and examples under /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.
Audit all smaller extension groups and their related prompt/support files: /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user, /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search, /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info, /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/model-info, /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ui-customization, and /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts. Ensure every file in those scopes is reviewed.
audit:shared — Audit — exact expanded prompt (1,127 characters)

Recorded state: done

You are auditing TypeScript extensions in /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Read /Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs and examples under /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.
Audit every file under /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/shared, including all tests. Focus especially on lifecycle, cancellation, timeout, state ownership, and duplicated abstractions.
audit:subagents — Audit — exact expanded prompt (1,168 characters)

Recorded state: done

You are auditing TypeScript extensions in /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Read /Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs and examples under /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.
Audit every file under /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/subagents, including all tests and its use of shared modules. Focus on concurrency, cancellation, session cleanup, delivery correctness, takeover behavior, and UI state.
audit:workflows — Audit — exact expanded prompt (1,198 characters)

Recorded state: error — Codex error: This content was flagged for possible cybersecurity risk. If this seems wrong, try rephrasing your request. To get authorized for security work, join the Trusted Access for Cyber program: https://chatgpt.com/cyber

You are auditing TypeScript extensions in /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Read /Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs and examples under /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.
Audit every file under /Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/workflows, including sandbox-child.cjs and all tests. Focus on sandbox security/correctness, orchestration concurrency, cancellation, serialization, artifacts, lifecycle cleanup, and over-complexity.
cross-check:integration — Cross-check — exact expanded prompt (8,192 characters)

Recorded state: done

You are auditing TypeScript extensions in /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Read /Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md. Because these are pi extensions, read /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md COMPLETELY and follow relevant markdown cross-references into /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs and examples under /Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions as needed. Inspect every assigned source and test file. Do not edit anything. Identify only evidence-backed bugs, simplifications, missing tests, maintainability/performance/security risks. Include exact file paths and line references in evidence where possible. Check repository status and package scripts/config where relevant. Distinguish real defects from stylistic preferences.
You are the integration reviewer. Here are independent audit results:
[{"scope":"Read-only audit of all requested smaller pi extensions and related prompt/support files. Reviewed pi extension/TUI/keybinding/theme documentation and relevant examples. Repository status was already dirty on main (notably deleted legacy extensions/ask-user.ts and extensions/firecrawl-search.ts with replacement directories untracked, plus unrelated subagent/workflow changes); the audit made no edits. Validation passed: npm run check, npm run format:check, and all 37 tests from npm test.","filesReviewed":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/prompt.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/prompt.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/model-info/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ui-customization/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/shared/dashboard-state.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/package.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/tsconfig.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/.gitignore","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/.env.example","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/README.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/SETUP.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/settings.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/themes/github-dark-default.json","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/tui.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/keybindings.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/themes.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/question.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/custom-header.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/custom-footer.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/overlay-test.ts"],"findings":[{"severity":"medium","category":"security","title":"The changed-files overlay renders repository-controlled terminal escape sequences","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts:59-60 sanitizes only CR/LF/tab in paths; lines 108-124 retain raw git diff output, and lines 207-222 and 377-387 pass raw diff lines through theme styling into the TUI. A local reproduction confirmed that `git diff --no-color` preserves an embedded OSC 52 sequence (`ESC ] 52 ... BEL`) from file content, so opening `/lg` on an untrusted checkout can execute terminal controls such as clipboard writes. Raw filenames from porcelain `-z` can carry controls too.","recommendation":"Strip or visibly escape all repository-supplied C0 controls and ANSI/OSC/APC sequences from paths and diff content before styling. Preserve only escape sequences generated by the extension's own theme calls. Add regression cases containing OSC 52, OSC title, CSI, BEL, and control characters in both filenames and file content.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"copy-all duplicates pi's clipboard implementation with a macOS-only and crash-prone subprocess wrapper","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts:29-48 always spawns `pbcopy`, so the command fails outside macOS. It listens for errors on the ChildProcess but not on `child.stdin`; if the utility exits before consuming a large write, the stdin socket can emit an unhandled EPIPE. This behavior was reproduced under the project's Node 24 runtime. The installed pi package already exports a cross-platform `copyToClipboard` helper with native, macOS, Wayland/X11, Termux, WSL, and OSC 52 fallbacks.","recommendation":"Delete the local spawn wrapper and import `copyToClipboard` from `@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent`. If retaining custom process code, support platforms explicitly and handle stdin errors/backpressure, but the exported helper is the simpler and safer option.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"Firecrawl requests do not actually respond to tool cancellation","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts:110 and 117 check the AbortSignal only before and after line 116's awaited request. The signal is not passed into search, scrape, or crawl. A crawl may wait up to 600 seconds (lines 223-251), so aborting the agent cannot stop the polling wait or cancel the remote crawl job; search/scrape can likewise remain pending until SDK/network timeouts.","recommendation":"Make the in-flight operation abort-aware. For crawl, use startCrawl/polling plus cancelCrawl when the signal aborts. For search and scrape, use an abort-capable transport/API path or at minimum race the wait against the signal and ensure late rejections are consumed. Preserve the original abort reason rather than wrapping cancellation as a generic Firecrawl failure.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"performance","title":"Firecrawl truncates model text but persists the complete large response in tool details","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts:86-98 truncates only the textual output, while lines 119-122 return `details` unchanged. Search and crawl assign the complete result to both details and output at lines 163-171 and 238-253, and scrape retains the complete Document (including full markdown) at lines 296-310. A 100-page crawl or scrapeResults search can therefore place megabytes into the session JSON even though model-facing content is capped at 50KB.","recommendation":"Keep details bounded: retain compact metadata, counts, URLs, and the saved full-output path, but omit or truncate duplicated markdown/page bodies. Test serialized tool-result size with a large crawl response.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"ask_user's custom component violates resize, IME-focus, and configured-keybinding contracts","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/index.ts:149 and 239-300 cache rendered lines without recording width, so a render after terminal narrowing can return lines sized for the previous width. The component embeds a focusable Editor at line 161 but returns a plain object at lines 303-309 without implementing Focusable or propagating focus, which pi's TUI documentation identifies as necessary for IME cursor placement. The injected keybinding manager is discarded as `_kb` at line 146 while lines 194-235 hardcod
[entry truncated]
plan:maintainer — Plan — exact expanded prompt (8,192 characters)

Recorded state: running

Act as a senior maintainer. Build a concise, actionable implementation plan from the extension audit below. The codebase is /Users/davis/.pi/agent. Do not invent issues and do not edit files. Deduplicate overlapping findings, discard claims not supported by concrete evidence, and prioritize correctness/security before simplification. Group work into 3-6 ordered phases. For each item include: priority (P0-P3), exact files, the change, rationale/observed failure mode, tests to add/update, dependencies, and rough effort (S/M/L). Explicitly list low-value suggestions to defer and explain why. Also include an audit coverage summary and any audit failures. Output polished Markdown ready to send directly to the user.

Partition audits:
[{"scope":"Read-only audit of all requested smaller pi extensions and related prompt/support files. Reviewed pi extension/TUI/keybinding/theme documentation and relevant examples. Repository status was already dirty on main (notably deleted legacy extensions/ask-user.ts and extensions/firecrawl-search.ts with replacement directories untracked, plus unrelated subagent/workflow changes); the audit made no edits. Validation passed: npm run check, npm run format:check, and all 37 tests from npm test.","filesReviewed":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/AGENTS.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/prompt.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/prompt.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/model-info/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ui-customization/index.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/shared/dashboard-state.ts","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/package.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/tsconfig.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/.gitignore","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/.env.example","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/README.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/SETUP.md","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/settings.json","/Users/davis/.pi/agent/themes/github-dark-default.json","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/extensions.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/tui.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/keybindings.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/docs/themes.md","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/question.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/custom-header.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/custom-footer.ts","/Users/davis/.vite-plus/js_runtime/node/24.18.0/lib/node_modules/@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent/examples/extensions/overlay-test.ts"],"findings":[{"severity":"medium","category":"security","title":"The changed-files overlay renders repository-controlled terminal escape sequences","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts:59-60 sanitizes only CR/LF/tab in paths; lines 108-124 retain raw git diff output, and lines 207-222 and 377-387 pass raw diff lines through theme styling into the TUI. A local reproduction confirmed that `git diff --no-color` preserves an embedded OSC 52 sequence (`ESC ] 52 ... BEL`) from file content, so opening `/lg` on an untrusted checkout can execute terminal controls such as clipboard writes. Raw filenames from porcelain `-z` can carry controls too.","recommendation":"Strip or visibly escape all repository-supplied C0 controls and ANSI/OSC/APC sequences from paths and diff content before styling. Preserve only escape sequences generated by the extension's own theme calls. Add regression cases containing OSC 52, OSC title, CSI, BEL, and control characters in both filenames and file content.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/git-info/changed-files-view.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"copy-all duplicates pi's clipboard implementation with a macOS-only and crash-prone subprocess wrapper","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts:29-48 always spawns `pbcopy`, so the command fails outside macOS. It listens for errors on the ChildProcess but not on `child.stdin`; if the utility exits before consuming a large write, the stdin socket can emit an unhandled EPIPE. This behavior was reproduced under the project's Node 24 runtime. The installed pi package already exports a cross-platform `copyToClipboard` helper with native, macOS, Wayland/X11, Termux, WSL, and OSC 52 fallbacks.","recommendation":"Delete the local spawn wrapper and import `copyToClipboard` from `@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent`. If retaining custom process code, support platforms explicitly and handle stdin errors/backpressure, but the exported helper is the simpler and safer option.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/copy-all.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"Firecrawl requests do not actually respond to tool cancellation","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts:110 and 117 check the AbortSignal only before and after line 116's awaited request. The signal is not passed into search, scrape, or crawl. A crawl may wait up to 600 seconds (lines 223-251), so aborting the agent cannot stop the polling wait or cancel the remote crawl job; search/scrape can likewise remain pending until SDK/network timeouts.","recommendation":"Make the in-flight operation abort-aware. For crawl, use startCrawl/polling plus cancelCrawl when the signal aborts. For search and scrape, use an abort-capable transport/API path or at minimum race the wait against the signal and ensure late rejections are consumed. Preserve the original abort reason rather than wrapping cancellation as a generic Firecrawl failure.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"performance","title":"Firecrawl truncates model text but persists the complete large response in tool details","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts:86-98 truncates only the textual output, while lines 119-122 return `details` unchanged. Search and crawl assign the complete result to both details and output at lines 163-171 and 238-253, and scrape retains the complete Document (including full markdown) at lines 296-310. A 100-page crawl or scrapeResults search can therefore place megabytes into the session JSON even though model-facing content is capped at 50KB.","recommendation":"Keep details bounded: retain compact metadata, counts, URLs, and the saved full-output path, but omit or truncate duplicated markdown/page bodies. Test serialized tool-result size with a large crawl response.","files":["/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/firecrawl-search/index.ts"]},{"severity":"medium","category":"bug","title":"ask_user's custom component violates resize, IME-focus, and configured-keybinding contracts","evidence":"/Users/davis/.pi/agent/extensions/ask-user/index.ts:149 and 239-300 cache rendered lines without recording width, so a render after terminal narrowing can return lines sized for the previous width. The component embeds a focusable Editor at line 161 but returns a plain object at lines 303-309 without implementing Focusable or propagating focus, which pi's TUI documentation identifies as necessary for IME cursor placement. The injected keybinding manager is discarded as `_kb` at line 146 while lines 194-235 hardcode arrows/Enter/Escape, so customized `tui.select.*` bindings are ignored. Additionally, labels and descriptions are truncated to one line at lines 260-275 rather than wrapped.","recommendation":"Use a width-aware cache, implement and propagate `focused` to the Editor, cons
[entry truncated]

7. Child-call contracts

The four audit agents and the integration reviewer used the same structured-output schema:

const AUDIT = {
  type: 'object',
  properties: {
    scope: { type: 'string' },
    filesReviewed: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
    findings: {
      type: 'array',
      items: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          severity: { type: 'string', enum: ['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low'] },
          category: { type: 'string', enum: ['bug', 'simplification', 'testing', 'maintainability', 'performance', 'security'] },
          title: { type: 'string' },
          evidence: { type: 'string' },
          recommendation: { type: 'string' },
          files: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }
        },
        required: ['severity', 'category', 'title', 'evidence', 'recommendation', 'files']
      }
    },
    strengths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } }
  },
  required: ['scope', 'filesReviewed', 'findings', 'strengths']
}

Call configuration by stage:

8. Source artifacts